**********
Zero Objection Requirement For Gated & Guarded Housing Applications In Selangor
Klang Municipal Council president Datuk Mohd Yazid Bidin, who confirmed receiving the circular, said the new ruling would be implemented in Klang with immediate effect.
Under the new ruling, Yazid said approval could be given to applications with 100% consent from residents from a particular area.
Even if there was one objection from a resident, he said the council would not process the application.
New applications for gated and guarded communities in Selangor will only be considered provided there is no objection from any of its residents.
The State Housing Board sent out circulars to all 12 local authorities on the new ruling.
The new ruling is with immediate effect following a change in policy by the Selangor state government, which earlier granted approval for gated and guarded applications based on 85% consent.
“However, the council will take the gesture of silence from the residents as consent,” he said, adding that it was up to the residents associations and property owners to sort it out.
Yazid said all the pending gated and guarded applications from various parts of Klang would be put on hold and the applicants would be required to meet the new criteria. However, he added the ruling for guarded communities remained at 85% consent from the residents.
"I hope the residents associations will comply with the new ruling,” he said.
METRO NEWS
By Elan Perumal
Friday, 31 Mar 2017
https://www.thestar.com.my/
Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/community/2017/03/31/zero-objection-requirement-for-new-gated-and-guarded-housing-applications-in-selangor/#isMCqU4KRHSHWCf2.99
*****************
New Gated Rules In Shah Alam - 100% Agreement For Auto Gates And More
THE Shah Alam City Council’s (MBSA) amended guidelines for the gated-and-guarded scheme is aimed at streamlining the process and avoiding confusion.
Among the new stipulations is 100% approval from residents for automated gates and access cards. Approval for manual boom gates is 75%. Barricades, which must be removable, are only permitted between midnight and 6am.
A guard has to be on duty by the barricade at other times in the event of an emergency. Security guards are also not allowed to take away the driver’s MyKad or other documents. Fencing is also not allowed unless the area is located near a highway, road, river or monsoon drain.
The amended guidelines are based on the state government’s recommendations, which were sent to 12 local councils.
Shah Alam city councillor Foong Saik Hoong said the guidelines were meant to resolve or avoid untoward issues.
In recent years, the issue divided residents in existing neighbourhoods over the implementation of the gated-and-guarded scheme with local councils being trapped in the middle.
“The conflict often happens with individuals who have personal agendas. “For it to work, residents associations (RAs) need to be united,” pointed out Foong,
“If there is a need to fence up the area, residents will have to apply to change the land status to strata but this means all maintenance work will be their responsibility instead of the council’s,” said Foong, adding that this would comprise road maintenance and rubbish collection.
Foong pointed out that some stipulations in the amended guidelines conflict with federal law such as the Street, Drainage and Building Act 1974 Section 46 that do not allow temporary buildings or obstructions without approval. This would include guardhouses and posts but they are allowed in the state-approved guidelines.
The amended guidelines require that submissions for approval be made to the One-Stop Centre (OSC) as well as the Planning Department for the guardhouse, speed breakers, boom gates and road excavation works.
“This way, there will be no illegal works that might pose a problem later,” said Foong. RAs will also have to apply for a temporary occupation licence (TOL) from the land office for their guardhouses.
There will also be a one-off payment of RM400 for the guardhouse per application which was not imposed previously. There is no requirement to obtain a certificate of completion and compliance (CCC) or certificate of fitness (CF) for the structure.
RAs will also not be allowed to block any road permanently or remove pavements to redirect traffic. Foong said approval for the guarded schemes was previously valid for two years but it has been extended to three now.
Some RAs expressed concerns about the amended guidelines, saying it may be tough for them to comply with. Bukit Kayangan Residents Association president Datuk Helmi Daud said there was no way a neighbourhood could get 100% approval from residents. “Getting 75% approval is already difficult, so we had to come up with an alternative solution,” he added.
Helmi said they hired guards who patrol around the neighbourhood from 7pm to 7am but had no guardhouse. The authorities, he added, should have consulted the RAs before implementing the guidelines. Kota Kemuning Residents Association president Allan Lee said 100% consent is too strict.
“It would only take one resident to stall all RA initiatives,” he said, adding that the strict guidelines made it seem like the authorities did not care about residents having a safe environment to live in. Lee said most RAs are run by volunteers who may not have the time and resources to fulfil all the stringent requirements.
METRO NEWS
By Priya Menon
Friday, 7 Jul 2017
https://www.thestar.com.my/
TAGS / KEYWORDS:
Central Region , Security Guard , Gated And Guarded , Shah Alam
Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/community/2017/07/07/new-gg-guidelines-for-shah-alam-local-authority-bases-rules-on-states-recommendation-but-ras-say-it/#xLcdABUR6suHwDuE.99
******************
Malaysia Gangsters Legitimise Protection Racket Through Security Guard Services
Residents in guarded communities are being forced to pay protection money - to their security guards.
Many of these guards are nothing more than gangsters who are legitimising their protection racket under the guise of providing security. Residents are effectively paying to protect themselves from those who stand guard.
Even the Security Services Association of Malaysia (PPKKM) admits that many of its member companies are backed by gangs.
Several residents associations (RAs) in Klang Valley are trapped with the gang-linked thugs or ex-convicts as guards.
Office bearers of some RAs claimed they were forced to continue hiring these companies after being threatened that gangsters would cause problems if their services were terminated. There have also been cases of fights between rival groups vying for the security business.
The most recent case involving a turf war among gangsters in Bandar Bukit Raja, Klang had left one security guard dead and six others injured.
A representative of an RA, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said many associations were enticed by gang-linked companies because of the low rates. But later we find that these guys are not even trained. Some come to work drunk," he said.
Another RA committee member claimed that fights had broken out at her gated community's guard post.
An RA chairman said when his neighbourhood was being patrolled by a suspected gang-linked company, houses of those who did not pay were frequently broken into.
A security industry veteran, who handles several RA contracts in the Klang Valley, said his clients found it difficult to get rid of gang-linked guards.
"One RA asked me to take over from a gang but I declined. No one dares to take over from a gang, it is something we don't want to get involved in," he said.
He said gang-patrolled neighbourhoods were on the rise in Klang, Rawang and some parts of Subang Jaya and Lembah Subang, with about RM2,000 from each housing area.
"If they control many areas, the profits are big. That's why gangs expand their territories and end up clashing with rivals for control," he added.
He said there was no certain way for an RA to check if a company had underworld backing or not, as most are operated under the licences of bigger security companies.
Community Policing Malaysia (CP) founder Kuan Chee Heng said RAs should vet potential security providers with the police to avoid paying protection money to the gangs.
THE STAR/
ASIA NEWS NETWORK
PUBLISHED MAY 18, 2015, 11:53 AM SGT
FYI Links:
http://www.moha.gov.my/images/maklumat_perkhidmatan/pekeliling_agensi_persendirian/pekeliling_1.pdf
***************
Gangsters Fighting Over Turf For "Security Services"
SECURITY companies provide the service of securing business premises, housing estates and other places, seeking to deny entry to trespassers. Reports of late, however, indicate that they are not what they make themselves out to be.
The recent attack on security guards in Bukit Raja, Klang, where one fatality was recorded and several others were injured, is just the tip of the iceberg. According to police, the motive behind this incident could be gangsters fighting over turf.
This is not the first time security guards have been attacked with the intention of intimidating residents, giving residents the impression that the security company they hired is incompetent. The result is a changing of the guards, so to speak.
The inspector-general of police, meanwhile, in relation to the recent attack, urged the public not to be pressured by gangsters offering security services, but instead, report the matter to the police.
It is strange how there is a sudden proliferation of guarded communities in many neighbourhoods in the Klang Valley. Could it be that the upmarket “gated community” concept has snob appeal and is being emulated more for prestige than fighting crime?
Malaysia has always been a peaceful country where restrictions on movement imposed by fear is alien. Even the police have undertaken a low-profile approach to community policing, except at certain times of the year when the “balik kampung” phenomenon leaves empty urban homes at risk of being broken into and roads become more dangerous than usual.
Or, is it a case of gangsters creating an atmosphere of insecurity ripe for their picking? That is, the protection racket has been honed to perfection: pay the crooks protection money by way of hiring their unregistered companies. In short, racketeering has taken a legitimate veneer.
The home minister said that licensed companies have been bought over by triads and criminals under the cover of which crimes are organised. This was confirmed by the inspector-general of police and the Security Services Association of Malaysia.
Whatever the answer, the security industry is, without a doubt, booming. However, the incidence of crimes committed by security guards themselves are of urgent concern, like the murder of an AmBank officer two years ago by an illegal foreign security guard, who robbed the very bank he was hired to protect. Soon after that incident, the authorities promised a clampdown to ensure all security companies are licensed and their guards legal and risk-free.
These companies were expected to submit their employees for police screening and training. The police have made themselves ready but the companies are shying away.
More terrible is the number of unregistered companies plying the trade, hiring any Tom, Dick and Harry as guards. Indeed, these men should be tracked down, but why hire them in the first place?
Fear is no excuse. Residents can come together and, with the help of the police, keep neighbourhoods safe. The Rukun Tetangga, when properly organised, can act as a 24/7 neighbourhood watch.
NST
April 22, 2015 @ 12:00pm
******************
Seven Charged In Security Turf War Murder
Seven men were charged in the Klang magistrate’s court today with murdering a security guard in what is believed to be a territorial war over security services at residential areas.
The seven, and few others still at large, are accused of murdering Muhammad Ridhzuan Che Bai, 26, with a parang at 2am on April 18 at the 11 Avenue residential area guardhouse in Bandar Bukit Raja, where the victim was on duty.
The accused – M. Yugaraj, 26; B. Saravanan, 33; N. Mageswaran, 25; N. Yogeswaran, 22; U. Kunalan, 22; C. Reshiwaran, 22 and E. Sasikumar, 26 – claimed trial to the charge under Section 302, read together with Section 149 of the Penal Code, which carries a mandatory death sentence.
Yugaraj and Saravanan were represented by P. Uthayakumar while the other five were represented by S. Saravanan. Uthayakumar told the court that Yugaraj and Saravanan were beaten while in police custody and suffered injuries.
Magistrate Mariam Maran Abdullah @ Lusia Muda Maran then ordered the police to send the two to a hospital for treatment. She fixed June 16 for next mention.
https://www.thesundaily.my/
01 MAY 2015
***************
Guard Torched To Death
KLANG: A security guard was burnt to death while six others were slashed in an early morning brawl, believed to be targets of a territorial war.
It took place at three high-end residential areas in Bandar Bukit Raja here at about 2am yesterday when the guard houses there became the target of the attack.
Two guard houses near Fuego and 11 Avenue were charred while the one in Awani was vandalised, said Deputy Klang North OCPD Supt Zailan Tasir.
He added that five men on five motorcycles were believed to be involved. “We believe that territorial rivalry was the cause of the attack,” he said when contacted yesterday.
Muhammad Ridzuan Che Bi, 26, was burnt to death when he was on duty at the 11 Avenue guard house. It is learned that his partner was patrolling in the residential area at the time of the attack.
Muhammad Ridzuan’s remains have been sent to the Tengku Ampuan Rahimah Hospital for a post-mortem.
Six others, who were on duty at the guard houses of Fuego and Awani, suffered slash wounds on their bodies. They are N. Arujunam, 64, Aziz Salim, 57, K. Muniandy, 61, A. Naagendran, 26, S. Renganathan, 45, and S. Kannan, 45. They have been warded at the same hospital for treatment.
Forensics police later collected blood swabs and finger prints from all three guard houses, which were within a 500m radius.
A Myanmar national working in a restaurant, who only wanted to be known as Awin, said he and his other friends were shocked to see the 11 Avenue guard house, which was less than 100m away from the restaurant, on fire.
“The shop where I work was already closed then. I was hanging out with my friends in front of the shop when we heard some noise.
“The fire spread quickly and became bigger. We were so afraid,” said Awin, 32. He said they immediately alerted their employer.
One resident noted that there were a few more residential projects coming up.
“This means the attack could be a war ning of sorts to the other rivals to mind their own territory,” he claimed.
Fuego residents association vice-president Tan Boon Kuang, 72, said they were concerned about the safety of the area after the incident.
NATION
By Allison Lai
Sunday, 19 Apr 2015
https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation
TAGS / KEYWORDS:
Bandar Bukit Raja , Security Guard , Territorial War
Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2015/04/19/guard-torched-to-death-six-others-injured-in-territorial-war-in-highend-residential-areas/#SOT31APV2i89T13j.99
***************
“Gangsters” More Than Guards
Residents in guarded communities are being forced to pay protection money – to their security guards.
Many of these guards are nothing more than gangsters who are legitimising their protection racket under the guise of providing security. Residents are effectively paying to protect themselves from those who stand guard.
Even the Security Services Association of Malaysia (PPKKM) admits that many of its member companies are backed by gangs.
Several residents associations (RAs) in Klang Valley are trapped with the gang-linked thugs or ex-convicts as guards. Office bearers of some RAs claimed they were forced to continue hiring these companies after being threatened that gangsters would cause problems if their services were terminated.
There have also been cases of fights between rival groups vying for the security business. The most recent case involving a turf war among gangsters in Bandar Bukit Raja, Klang had left one security guard dead and six others injured.
A representative of an RA, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said many associations were enticed by gang-linked companies because of the low rates. “They charge about RM4 or RM5 an hour. But later we find that these guys are not even trained. Some come to work drunk,” he said.
Another RA committee member claimed that fights had broken out at her gated community’s guard post.
An RA chairman said when his neighbourhood was being patrolled by a suspected gang-linked company, houses of those who did not pay were frequently broken into.
A security industry veteran, who handles several RA contracts in the Klang Valley, said his clients found it difficult to get rid of gang-linked guards.
“One RA asked me to take over from a gang but I declined. No one dares to take over from a gang, it is something we don’t want to get involved in,” he said.
He said gang-patrolled neighbourhoods were on the rise in Klang, Rawang and some parts of Subang Jaya and Lembah Subang, with about RM2,000 from each housing area.
“If they control many areas, the profits are big. That’s why gangs expand their territories and end up clashing with rivals for control,” he added.
He said there was no certain way for an RA to check if a company had underworld backing or not, as most are operated under the licences of bigger security companies.
Community Policing Malaysia (CP) founder Kuan Chee Heng said RAs should vet potential security providers with the police to avoid paying protection money to the gangs.
NATION
By Nicholas Cheng
Monday, 18 May 2015
https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation
Related stories:
‘About 40 member companies backed by gangs’
Act to be amended to rein in security industry
TAGS / KEYWORDS:
Gangsters , Guarded Communities , Security , Protection Money
Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2015/05/18/gangsters-more-than-guards-residents-forced-to-pay-for-protection-money-under-guise-of-security/#iWb5mIS0twMojP9p.99
FYI Links:
http://www.moha.gov.my/images/maklumat_perkhidmatan/pekeliling_agensi_persendirian/pekeliling_1.pdf
***************
Dubious Guards Doing The Rounds
WHY is there the trend of guards patrolling housing estates today?
Previously it was only for gated communities. In Taman Tun Dr Ismail where I stay, this has become a “necessity.”
Some individuals in guard uniforms have gone from door to door offering to patrol the neighbourhood for a fee.
Not everyone, including me, agree to such an arrangement. We cannot ascertain their background, let alone let them “protect our homes.” This may become a permanent affair. Who knows what will happen if one were to discontinue the service.
Just yesterday, the aluminium door to my rubbish chute was stolen along with my neighbour’s, two doors away.
Was this a warning to enrol for this service or just a misdeed by irresponsible individuals? It looks as if I am being coerced to pay “protection money” for peace to my home.
I have been staying in this neighbourhood for the past 17 years and this is the first time the door to my rubbish chute was stolen.
It would seem futile to make a police report over such an inexpensive item. I thank God it was not something more serious.
The presence of our friendly neighbourhood policeman is a rare sight nowadays. Where have they gone?
Busy guarding VIPs or hiding behind some trees to catch traffic offenders?
Have there been many resignations in the police force? If so, is it because of low pay?
In that case, a revision should be in order. No doubt, many rank-and-file officers hold SPM or PMR qualifications and, therefore, are not entitled to high salaries but the risks they take in the line of duty should be taken into account.
I appeal to the authorities to properly streamline the practice of guard patrols sprouting all over housing estates, in particular, those with minimal or no police presence.
I still strongly believe in the protection of the police as the “official protector of the people.”
LIVING IN FEAR,
Kuala Lumpur.
Sources:
10/01/2007 The Star
http://www.hba.org.my/
National House Buyers Association
Persatuan Kebangsaan Pembeli Rumah
**************
Don’t Let Your Guard Down
More and more housing areas in the Klang Valley are adopting the gated and guarded security scheme in view of the rising crime cases. Once the residents association worked out the details, a guardhouse is built, the entry-exit points are closed, security guards are stationed at strategic points and residents are issued car stickers.
While putting aside the debates on the legality of such schemes (it is prohibited to obstruct public roads under the Street, Drainage and Building Act 1974), the legitimacy and efficiency of the guards employed are worth exploring.
Those who are against the gated and guarded security scheme say they are not convinced that their areas would be safeguarded by laymen donning the security guard uniform.
Their worry is not without basis. Kuan Chee Heng, who is the founder of a community policing website (http://cops.org.my/), said some of the security companies do not have proper licences. “As far as I am concerned, there are about 400 licensed security companies as of February this year.
“They must be issued Licence 2 (a) under the Private Agency Act 1971 to provide personal guard and protection for the safety of somebody else or safety of property or other people’s business,” he said. Even if the company has a licence, most of the guards are untrained and thus not be allowed to work as security guards.
“The Home Affairs Ministry only allows locals and Nepalese to work as guards, but one can see foreigners like Bangladeshis, Pakistanis and Indians in the housing areas now. “They may be illegal or legal foreigners who have come into the country using working permits for other jobs,” he said.
The reason they take up jobs as security guards instead of those stated in their permits is because the salary may be higher. However, their salary will still be lower than the locals or Nepalese.
Kuan claims the foreigners have taken a step further by setting their own group and soliciting money from residents in exchange for their “security services”. “They do not have proper uniform, just reflective vests over their clothes,” Kuan said.
To prove his point, Kuan took StarMetro for a drive around Puchong and Serdang in search of the gated and guarded housing areas. In Taman Lestari Putra, we spotted a Pakistani man, who appeared to be in his late 20s, riding a motorcycle in his uniform.
We asked what kind of work permit he is holding and he replied, “Ladang (plantation).” Kuan then enquired about his employment. “I work for a security company, but if you can help, I want to start my own company,” he said.
We also visited a neighbourhood in Bandar Puteri Puchong where the Indian guard could no converse with us properly due to language barrier.
Kuan pointed out the danger of hiring foreigners as security guards – not only that they are not accustomed to our laws and culture, they cannot make police reports on the crime incidents and testify in court.
“They are not supposed to be working as guards, so naturally they wouldn’t appear in front of the authority. “Even though they are witnesses of the crime cases, they cannot give their statements to the police,” he said.
This, coupled with the fact that they are untrained, proved that foreign security guards cannot provide proper protection to the people who employ them.
In fact, some local guards, like the ones serving a residential area in Bandar Kinrara, admitted that they did not undergo training before working as a security guard.
“I once asked a guard why he didn’t call 999 when a fire happened, and he said his mobile phone did not have any credit left. “If he had been trained, he would know that he can make emergency calls under such circumstances,” Kuan said.
The effectiveness of the security service is often questionable. Most sit at the entry-exit points of housing areas and salute just about everyone who drives in. Some guards also appear to be frail and old, thus unfit to serve as guards.
Kuan pointed out that the police would focus their manpower on those areas that did not have such a security scheme, and thus those gated and guarded ones must ensure that the guards were up to the mark.
He advised the residents to ensure that the guards employed by security firms are either locals or Nepalese, and screen the guards by submitting their names to the nearest police station. “They must not have crime records. The guards should also take urine tests periodically to ensure that they are not drug users.
“The insurance coverage for any losses or thefts occurred should also be negotiated with the company,” he added. Nonetheless, Kuan said the security guards might be exploited by the company who employed them. “They are not sent for training because it is costly – it is RM250 for Level One of a basic course and RM700 for Level Two. For Nepalese, it is RM400 for Level One. “They are underpaid and overworked, and most do not have EPF and Socso benefits. They do not have insurance coverage, too,” he said.
He advised the residents to pay the security firms well in order to get a proper security service in return, and provide proper shelter to the guards instead of a makeshift booths. All in all, Kuan stressed that one’s safety is not guaranteed in a gated and guarded area.
“The community must work together in order to curb crime. “Your neighbour is your first line of defence. “Establishing strong ties and close rapport among the neighbours is more important than anything else. “Teach the elderly and children to be vigilant and call the local police stations in case you notice any suspicious character,” he said.
The Selangor police hotline is 03-2052 9999.
COMMUNITY
By Tho Xin Yi
Tuesday, 13 Oct 2009
https://www.thestar.com.my/
TAGS / KEYWORDS:
Community , News
Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/news/community/2009/10/13/dont-let-your-guard-down/#EOltEg7jipGRtekb.99
***************
Illegals Caught Working As Security Guards
Illegal foreign workers are all over the country, especially in housing areas, including the residences of the elite group. This is because high-end housing areas will employ security guards, most of them foreigners, to monitor and patrol the neighbourhood.
Selangor Immigration Department director Mohamad Shukri Nawi said his officers conducted a joint operation with the Home Ministry to check on foreigners working as security guards. The operation was carried out at five premises around Petaling Jaya and Batu Caves on Wednesday.
Out of the 24 individuals screened, eight were found to be foreigners and working illegally. They comprised four Nepalese, three Indians and a Myanmar national.
Mohamad Shukri said the operation was focused on hot spots, gated and guarded communities, including apartments and condominiums. “We will conduct operations from time to time through our own intelligence, information and complaints from the public.
“Even high-end housing areas will be checked because there are foreigners who work as security guards. “Among the offences committed by them include not having proper documents, misuse of social visit passes, no valid work permit or one that has expired, as well as falsification of documents,” he said.
The cases are being investigated under Section 6(1)(c), Section 15(1)(c) and Section 56(1)(1) of the Immigration Act 1959/1963, as well as Rule 39(b) of the Immigration Regulations 1963.
On Thursday, The Star reported that living in gated and guarded communities may not ensure safety and security.
Six houses belonging to residents of USJ Heights in Subang Jaya were broken into in a span of five months.
When asked on the matter, Mohamad Shukri said police would investigate criminal cases while Immigration would monitor illegal foreign workers to see if any immigration offences were committed, especially in housing areas.
“We also act based on reports and complaints from the local community. If they suspect something is amiss among the security guards in their areas, they can always lodge a report.
“Residents should provide us with accurate information, especially their housing address, so we can act promptly,” he said, adding that only Nepalese were legally allowed to work as foreign security guards in the country.
NATION
By Iwan Shu-Aswad Shuaib
Saturday, 8 Sep 2018
https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation
TAGS / KEYWORDS:
Government , Selangor Immigration , Gated And Guarded , Security Guards
Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2018/09/08/illegals-caught-working-as-security-guards/#gFPX1WV4BAgHzqBk.99
FYI Links:
http://www.moha.gov.my/images/maklumat_perkhidmatan/pekeliling_agensi_persendirian/pekeliling_1.pdf
**************
Issues With Guarded Scheme
As in any form of security, a guarded scheme or even a gated and guarded scheme is not foolproof.
“At least we know that those not staying in the scheme cannot come in and go out without any form of control.
“The guards will ask for their particulars like name and IC,” Lam said. He said there was one break-in, recently.
It happened in a house where the owner refused to pay maintenance fees.
And what was most annoying was that the victim complained on the security and demanded to view the closed CCTV, Lam said. And certainly there are people who take opportunity, over the people’s concern for security.
In Bandar Sri Damansara, a resident, only known as MY Shu said there was a spate of break ins and petty theft in the neighbourhood before a few men who claimed to be from a security firm, approached the residents to offer their services.
“Some of us suspected these so-called guards were either the robbers, thieves or their accomplices.
“They purposely frighthened us so that we would take up their offer,” she said, adding that the “guards” quoted RM30 monthly fees.
The “guards” would put up a little signboard on the gate for those who paid for their service. She said she did not take up the offer.
A similar type of patrolling service was also offered to residents in Taman Rasa Sayang, Ipoh, some time ago. A housewife said the “guards” had asked for RM20 a month. “They put up a little signboard on my gate, saying this house is being patrolled.
“But I do not know whether they actually did the patrolling,” she said, adding that the “guards” came and collected the fees for a few months and disappeared after that.
Reference:
http://www.starproperty.my/
By FOONG PEK YEE
May 29, 2012
***************
Nur Jazlan: Criminals Now Operating From Gated Communities
Criminals are now operating from gated and guarded community within housing estates to avoid police from going after them, said Datuk Nur Jazlan Mohamed.
The Deputy Home Minister said the activities taking place in the gated and guarded communities included online gambling and prostitution.
He said such illegal activities were more prevalent in residential areas which did not have a gated and guarded scheme in its original development plan.
"Residents only started complaining to the police when they finally realised that vice activities were taking place in their neighbourhood," said Nur Jazlan after handing over financial allocation to 37 resident associations to finance the security and patrolling of their areas.
NATION
By Zazali Musa
Saturday, 25 Nov 2017
https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation
Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2017/11/25/nur-jazlan-criminals-operating-gated-communities/#26kLbMQJrxWEUk1R.99
**************
Residents Breach MBPJ Guidelines To Stay Safe
“While citizens can get together to improve neighbourhood security, it is actually beyond the RA’s resources and capabilities to address the security issues on their own.
“The responsibility of ensuring safe neighbourhoods lies with the local, state and federal government levels.
Some residents from SS7 Lengkuk Golf , Kelana Jaya at Petaling Jaya have taken drastic measures by fixing electric fences and barbed wires surrounding their houses.Based on a StarMetro’s visit to the neighbourhood, it was obvious the residents were not leaving their safety to chances.
Some residents in Kelana Jaya SS7 have taken drastic measures by fixing electric fences and barbed wires around their houses.
“We shouldn’t have to live in neighbourhoods with electric fences, guard houses and blocked roads,” he said, adding that citizens could still become victims of crime when they leave the gated community.
At SS3, Petaling Jaya, a group of residents have installed an automatic access card system. They have also blocked entry and closed several roads round the clock.
However, not all residents agree with the measures taken.
Cecelia Kok said she is against the closure of public roads.
Kok said it would not deter crime but instead transfer the problem to another area.
“How can you close public roads for 24 hours and deprive others from using them? There are plans to close more roads here.
“We are totally against it,” she said.
Those who are not contributing to the access card system are deprived from using certain roads, too.
“I have signatures from 120 residents who are against this,” she said.
Many are taking the law into their own hands, by setting up guarded community schemes without obtaining approval first. Some have even blocked entry to public roads and introduced access card systems. So far, only 67 neighbourhoods have obtained approval from the council to implement the scheme with many running illegally.
Against The Law
MBPJ guidelines for the guarded community scheme prevent the obstruction of public roads, fencing off of public land and the denial of access to law abiding citizens.
Petaling Jaya councillor Derek Fernandez said citizens may want to use those roads even if they do not live there.
Indiscriminate closure or obstruction of public roads would lead to traffic congestion and the potential increase in the risk of crime to other areas which do not have such schemes.
He added that in the interest of public safety, the government has allowed some restrictions to the access of public roads.
However, putting automatic access control machines on public roads and other unapproved measure is not only a breach of several laws but also affects the legitimacy of such schemes.
The laws and guidelines must be respected and adhered to, said Fernandez.
“We cannot break the law and claim we are doing it to prevent crime.
“Many citizens are not robbers and their rights of mobility on roads must be respected,” he said in urging residents to follow the guidelines and obtain approval before building any structure or implementing any scheme.
“If the guidelines are inadequate, they must urge lawmakers such as assemblyman, MPs and even the state government to amend them,” he said.
Fernandez also pointed out that not all neighbourhoods could afford guarded schemes.
“It may lead to social segregation of communities,” he said.
At the council’s fullboard meeting yesterday, an application by the SS3 neighbourhood to close access to the public at Jalan SS3/76 and Jalan SS3/78 was rejected.
The council also rejected an application by the Section 5 neighbourhood to close off Jalan 5/10.
“We rejected their applications because they did not fulfil the guidelines,” said Mohd Azizi in urging neighbourhoods to first check the guidelines.
He said the council would issue a seven-day notice to the neighbourhood to remove the barrier or it would be demolished.
MBPJ public relations officer Zainun Zakaria said they would also not allow the access card system.
“The council has issued a notice to dismantle the access card system. We do not allow it in any guarded community scheme,” she said.
Source:
METRO NEWS
By Sheila Sri Priya
Thursday, 30 Jun 2016
TAGS / KEYWORDS:
Central Region , Family Community , Gated And Guarded Kelana Jaya Ss3
Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/community/2016/06/30/residents-breach-mbpj-guidelines-to-stay-safe-some-guarded-communities-in-petaling-jaya-going-overbo/#E8eE7H7waUYDAbCq.99
*************
Letter To The Star: Not For Gated And Guarded Facility
I WISH to share my experience regarding the subject of gated and guarded neighbourhood. I object to it because of the following reasons (not in order of importance):
First, the committee is “elected” by a small number of attendees who have their own selfish agenda.
Second, only certain roads have road humps so as to divert traffic to other “certain” roads that don’t have them.
Third, guard houses are set up in places where certain members of the community will not be disturbed by the noise coming from the guards (such as their radios or smart phones), and the stopping and starting of cars.
Fourth, diverting traffic when vehicles drop off or pick up the children from the school, twice a day, to certain roads (to the advantage of certain members).
Which means the other roads will face noise, traffic jams and pollution twice a day, as well as speeding cars when they are running late.
Fifth, not every member can afford to pay the monthly fee. And then they have to put up with ugly stares from the guards.
VICTIMISED BY GnG
Kuala Lumpur
LETTERS
Thursday, 20 Jul 2017
https://www.thestar.com.my/
TAGS / KEYWORDS:
Letters , Gated And Guarded Communities
Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/letters/2017/07/20/not-for-gated-and-guarded-facility/#hQT4iph5DtELGqPz.99
*****************
Unlawful ‘Roadblocks’
WHERE do you want to go? Friend’s house? Address? Don’t know, but know which house? If you don’t know, you cannot enter!
Sounds familiar? I have experienced the frustration of being stopped and questioned and, sometimes, denied access on public roads, while trying to visit friends or get across to other areas of various housing estates, the most recent being on a public road at Jalan Anggerik Eria 31/109, Kota Kemuning.
The public could use this road to get to other parts of Kota Kemuning previously without hindrance. At times, I have even been asked to produce my IC before I was allowed access on some public roads.
By the police? No, I am talking about private guards. Do these guards have the authority or power to set up “permanent” roadblocks on a public road and to stop, question and deny access to the public?
Under section 78 of the Road Transport Act, 1987 (Power to set up road-blocks), “any police officer in uniform authorised in writing by a senior police officer of the rank of Inspector and above” or “any road transport officer in uniform authorised in writing by the Director” may erect or cause to be erected or placed any barrier as prescribed on or across any road.
Under section 21 of the Police Act 1967, it “shall be the duty of police officers ? to keep order on public roads, streets, thoroughfares and landing places and at other places of public resort and places to which the public have access.”
Thus, if any other person (other than a police officer or road transport officer in uniform, duly authorised by a senior police officer or Director) erects or cause to be erected or placed any barrier on or across any road, he “shall be guilty of an offence” pursuant to section 119 of the Road Transport Act.
But residents claim that the local authorities have approved such permanent roadblocks or barriers.
Well, section 9 (10) of the Street, Drainage and Building Act 1974 provides that “no person shall erect or maintain or permit to be erected or maintained any obstruction in any street ?”
Section 46 of the same Act then provides that “any person who ? builds, erects, sets up or maintains or permits to be built, erected or set up or maintained any wall, fence, rail, post ? or other obstruction, in any public place ? shall be guilty of causing an obstruction and may be arrested without warrant by any police officer or any officer or employee of the local authority ?”
Section 46(4) of the 1974 Act reserves to our local authorities the power to only allow “any temporary erections in any public place or the temporary use of any part of a public place on occasions of festivals and ceremonies.”
It is thus quite obvious in my view that our local authorities do not have the power to authorise any such “permanent” roadblocks or barrier on or across any public road.
Security is important, but can the public’s rights and freedom be curtailed unlawfully in the name of security?
If residents want security, the guards can follow any person who passes or enters their areas but they have no right to stop, question or prevent any person from accessing public roads and enjoying public amenities such as playgrounds, badminton and basketball courts, fields, etc in these public areas.
I thus hope that the IGP and the minister in charge of local government will take the necessary action to stop such unlawful roadblocks on public roads and also ensure that local authorities do not exceed their powers by giving approvals in disregard of the above Acts of Parliament.
AGAINST UNLAWFUL ROADBLOCKS,
Petaling Jaya.
Source:
https://www.hba.org.my/main.htm
11/08/2007
The Star
****************
Illegal Fencing Must Go, Residents Told
Housing estates that have illegally fenced up their areas must now pull down the structure before Johor Baru City Hall takes action against them.
This is the city hall warning to residents who have illegally created gated communities.
Mayor Datuk Mohd Naim Nasir said it has identified 14 housing estates that have illegal fencing.
“We have issued three notices to three housing estate communities in the last two weeks. We will take action against the other 11 soon.”
He said records showed that none of the 14 housing estates had sought approval before installing the fences.
He warned that the city hall would in future tear down fences without giving notice.
Mohd Naim said this on Tuesday after launching SP Setia Bhd “Road to Charity” drive at Setia Tropika.
He said the council had no choice but to act against offenders as such fences had caused inconvenience to adjoining residential estates.
He said only standalone housing project that is isolated from other residential or business areas would be allowed to have a gated community.
“We know residents put up such fences to ensure their safety and security. However, this is not allowed.
“Alternatively, they should organise a neighbourhood watch like Rukun Tetangga.”
He said any housing estate that set up the neighbourhood watch scheme would be entitled to a RM4,800 subsidy to buy equipment such as torch lights.
Source:
https://www.hba.org.my/main.htm
03/03/2007
The Star
By Meera Vijayan
*****************
No Legal Right To Block Public Road
Your report on gated and guarded communities and its current popularity (StarMetro May 10) did highlight one point which is an issue for concern as well.
The point mentioned is the right of passage of roads.
I am staying in Bukit Jalil and in order for me to access my house, I have to travel through Jalan 7/155B across Taman Esplanad to connect to Jalan 3/155B.
The problem is that this public road has been blocked by the residents of Taman Esplanad by erecting a barrier to stop outside vehicles from entering the public road.
Each time, I have to seek permission from the guards to get access through the public road to reach my house at the other end.
Sometimes the guards are not so obliging and I have to argue my way through. This is really getting out of hand at the public ‘sexpense.
I understand the residents of Taman Esplanade’s concern over security, but to block off a public road and cause inconvenience to others is not a solution.
Furthermore, they have no legal right to erect the barrier on a public road, especially so if it is used by other residents to gain access to their home via the same road and also there are bus stops located along the road.
Is the local authority able to act on this since the area is under the purview of DBKL?
LWS ,Kuala Lumpur
Source:
https://www.hba.org.my/main.htm
24/05/2007
The Star
****************
More Bad Than Good In A Gated Community
Living in a gated community is not entirely trouble-free as residents in such places have to bear with a major problem such as getting the local authorities to provide services such as garbage collection, clearing drains and covering potholes.
As ratepayers, the residents are entitled to such services.
However, the physical barrier put up at the guarded and gated community makes it difficult for the local authorities to render such services.
Alinah: ‘Access roads that are blocked do not belong to the residents’
“We know the local authority is supposed to provide us with the services but then when we contacted them, they say they could not come in. They said we should do away with the security guard and barrier at our main entrance. But then again, if we remove the guards and the gates what is the point of calling it a gated community,” said Janet Leong who has been residing in one of the oldest gated community in Shah Alam.
Leong, who wished not to reveal the location of her house, claimed that they have been facing the problem for several years.
She said her residents association had been arguing with the local authority and their management company for quite sometime on the issue.
Such problems are quite common, said Selangor Housing and Real Property Board executive director Datin Paduka Alinah Ahmad.
She said usually residents or housebuyers were the ones at the losing end.
“Previously there were no clear guidelines for the developers to follow, leaving many grey areas which at the end leads to problems,” she said during a talk on the Implementation of Gated Community Development in Selangor held at Carlton Holiday Hotel and Suites, Shah Alam recently.
The problems include the public’s right to access a gated area without screening, legal rights of management corporations to the common areas and service charge collection.
Alinah said the access roads to the residential development were usually blocked to allow access to residents only.
“However, these blocked access roads do not belong to the residents living in such housing schemes,” she said, adding that once the developer applied for the titles for the individual homes in the area, the access roads had to be handed over to the local authority.
“The problem will arise when the application is made for individual titles for the houses in the area as the title was released without the access roads and other common areas being handed over to the local council. That means the local authority cannot go in and maintain the road and provide service to the residents,” she said.
Selangor state housing committee chairman Datuk Mokhtar Dahlan said the implementation of the new guidelines on gated communities would ensure that residents get their services from the local authority without sacrificing the security and safety they wanted.
“The state government hopes the guidelines will cover the grey areas and provide common solutions to problems faced by local authorites, developers and residents or housebuyers,” he added.
Source:
https://www.hba.org.my/main.htm
10/05/2007
The Star
*****************
The Myth Of Gated Communities
MUCH has been said in the last few years about gated-and-guarded communities. The fear of rising crime rates has ensured this phenomenon will continue to be in everyone’s mind when purchasing a property to live in.
In recent years, crime incidences, such as snatch thefts and break-ins, have escalated to a level where the general man in the street is genuinely afraid for his safety and well-being. So the market is now demanding for properties within a gated-and-guarded community. And even it weren’t for such property, the developer must provide some form of assurance of safety to the occupants.
For older properties which do not have these facilities, residents have taken it upon themselves to organise some form of security within the estate they live in. The most popular and easiest method is to fence up the area, close some entrances and place a boom gate-and-guard house at the main entrance.
For newer developments and condominiums, the gated and guarded feature forms part of the development and has been planned and incorporated into the estate. This, of course, works better than the ad-hoc fencing and guard house. But is all this just a fallacy? Do they work?
I have seen many instances where all you have to do is drive up to the gate and wave at the guard. He then waves back at you as if he knows you and promptly proceeds to open the gate, allowing you easy access to the housing area.
Other times, security is stricter and the guard will actually stop you and enquire where you’re going. You may or may not be required to register yourself at the guard house and perhaps leave behind your driver’s licence or some other form of identification.
A friend of mine lives in an organised gated area in SS2, Petaling Jaya. One Sunday evening, at about 5pm, a car drove up to his house. Three men suddenly climbed over his front wall and broke into his home, brandishing parangs. They proceeded to tie him and his maid up and asked his wife to accompany them upstairs.
They ransacked the house of cash, jewellery, laptops and mobile phones. They then had the audacity to ask my friend for his car keys and promptly drove off in his Honda Civic. At the guard house, the guard waved at them and allowed both cars to leave the premises.
The questions that beg to be answered are these:
•With a born gate and guards at the gate, how did these strangers enter the estate unchecked?
•With guards patrolling the neighbourhood, how is it that no one saw the entire incident unfolding for nearly half an hour?
•How did both cars manage to exit the neighbourhood past the guards?
•Did the guards not notice a stranger at the wheel of the familiar Honda Civic?
So, are gated-and-guarded facilities really secure? Or do they just give the impression that they are? Although these guards are not trained or equipped to ensure zero crime, but could their mere presence contribute to a vast reduction in crimes?
I think anyone planning to organise their “taman” into a guarded enclave should take cognisance of the followings:
1. You get what you pay for. If you are unable to organise a large enough pool of people who contribute to service charges, you will not be able to hire guards of any calibre.
2. Your guards are the be-all and end- all of the service you are trying to provide. If there are no strict systems and processes put in place, then you can be sure that your guards will be there merely as window-dressing.
3. Enforcement is the key. If discipline and adherence to the systems and processes are not strictly enforced, everything will eventually fail.
4. Cooperation of each and everyone in the estate is vital. If a large number of people don’t contribute, the whole thing will eventually fail and collapse.
5. The amount collected from each household must be adequate for the service to be provided with any measure of success. If you are going to be constantly facing cash flow problems, the system will also fail.
6. Volunteers are important. The community must volunteer to man the system and enforce the process. This is vital to the success of any community living. The more the dedication shown by the community itself, the easier it will be to make the whole thing work.
Happy hunting and may the force be with you.
The writer is a real estate practitioner who is passionate about the property industry and tries to manage the labyrinth of the market honestly while consistently maintaining a high standard of ethics in his practice.
Reference:
https://www.nst.com.my/
By SIVA SHANKER -
January 25, 2018 @ 1:37pm
***************
Gated & Guarded, And Lulled Into False Sense Of Safety
LIVING in a gated-and-guarded community may not ensure the safety and security of your property and belongings as residents of USJ Heights in Subang Jaya discovered in the last two years.
The community has state-of-the-art facilities including a QR code registration for visitors, cameras at strategic locations, electric and perimeter fencing as well as round-the-clock security surveillance.
Despite all these safety measures, residents here have been victims of an organised crime syndicate that has left them baffled.
This year alone, six houses were broken into in a span of five months; only two houses escaped this spate of burglaries. Two of the houses were hit on the same night. Similarly, in early 2016, three houses were also broken into on the same night.
Living in fear, the residents spoke to StarMetro on condition of anonymity, hoping to warn others who live in the gated-and-guarded neighbourhood.
Two of the latest victims said they were shocked that the presence of two foreign cars in their neighbourhood went unnoticed for more than an hour during the incident on July 29.
Upon discovering that their homes were ransacked, they questioned the security guards who revealed that two unknown continental cars passed through the residents lane at the entrance.
“We believe one car used a transponder while the second car tailgated the first. It is amazing how the security guards did not find anything amiss with their behaviour,” said a victim, known only as Lai.
He said he left his house that night at 8.30pm for an unplanned dinner and came back an hour later to find his doors ajar and lights on.
He alerted the security guards who came unarmed, using just a broomstick to confront the robbers. After a thorough check, they realised the robbers had fled. Lai then asked the guards to comb the area.
“When they were out looking for them, they spotted the two cars. However, after a quick chase, the guards said the cars rammed through the barricade at the entrance and made their getaway,” he said.
Lai said there was no way they could have known beforehand that his house would be empty as he did not have a set schedule.
In fact, he could see from his own CCTV footage that the thieves were rather nonchalant and even had time to do a few burpees on the lawn before making off with his goods.
The other victim, known only as Sheila, said she left her house at 7pm to pick up her maid from the KL International Airport and returned at 10.15pm after dinner.
The robbers looted all her jewellery, opened the safe and cut off her Astro decoder and CCTV camera recorder.
“I managed to obtain CCTV footage from my neighbours since my main cameras were not working. The thieves looked like Caucasians or Latin Americans. They were tall and looked very relaxed,” she said.
Sheila added that another footage caught them walking coolly back to a black BMW while drinking from a bottle of water.
The robbers were also seen attempting to break into four other houses, but ran off on realising that the houseowners were home.
They appeared fit and athletic as they jumped over fences and high walls with relative ease.
All this does not add up as there is only one entry and exit post in the neighbourhood.
One of the victims of the robberies in 2016 said the robbers managed to cart off a 50kg safe box from his home before jumping over his lawn fence and driving off. He said it was surprising that the guards did not detect an unknown car parked in the neighbourhood.
Residents are upset that most of their security features do not work, including the CCTV at the front gate, the Centralised Monitoring System (CMS) as well as their intercom that is connected to the guard post.
The security facilities and services were provided by the developer from the outset as part and parcel of the sale of the houses in USJ Heights. The houseowners are also disappointed that the security guards and the developer are lax about the entire issue.
Most of the victims have lodged police reports, but were shocked to hear the police describe the intruders as “locals”. They said some of the CCTV footage clearly showed the face of one of the burglars who did not have Asian features at all. “Moreover, the act of cutting off the Astro decoder did not make sense unless they knew that it was linked to the CCTV recorder,” said Sheila.
The residents only took over the maintenance of the security and the guards last year, and refused to accept the task of maintaining the equipment such as the CCTVs until they were fixed. He added that the developer must hand over the amenities “in working order” to the residents association. Besides, there is no legal document to state that the handover has been completed.
He also said this was a good reminder to all residents that they should know their rights as housebuyers to ensure the promised goods and services are kept in working order for their benefit. “We want people to know that living in a gated-and-guarded community is not foolproof,” he added.
Living in a gated-and-guarded community may not ensure the safety of your property as residents of USJ Heights discovered in the last two years. One of the houses that was ransacked in USJ Heights was turned upside down in just 20 minutes.
This year alone six houses in USJ Heights were broken into in a span of five months, with only two houses escaping the spate of burglaries.
METRO NEWS
By Priya Menon
Thursday, 6 Sep 2018
https://www.thestar.com.my
TAGS / KEYWORDS:
Central Region , Usj Heights , Selangor , Break Ins
Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/metro-news/2018/09/06/lulled-into-false-sense-of-safety-despite-paying-for-security-facilities-residents-in-usj-heights-ar/#9S7L8zC1VLOsRfzw.99
****************
DBKL: No Intention To Divide Communities
WHAT initially started off as a safety initiative by residents to make their houses more secure, or in the words of one resident, “the robber will think twice before entering my house”, has not only put Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) in a tight spot, but has divided communities and inconvenienced residents to the point they feel like an outsider in their own neighbourhood.
In March 2015, a five-member panel chaired by Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin decreed in the case of Au Kean Hoe against (D’Villa Equestrian Residents Association - a certified gated-and-guarded scheme) that regulated access to a defined area was not an obstruction in law, particularly if it was for security reasons.
The judges added that it was only illegal if a person was denied access to a public place, unlike Au’s home, which was a certified gated-and-guarded scheme.
Two years after the Federal Court legalised the placing of boom gates across public roads and guardhouses in residential areas, the walls have literally gone up in every neighbourhood in Kuala Lumpur.
Barriers in the form of manual and automated boom gates, steel barricades, perimeter fencing, steel drums, cones, and even retired motor tyres have been used by residents associations (RAs) to block public roads leading into residential homes from intruders and the public.
He said guardhouses and boom gates were authorised structures under the Town and Country Planning Act 1976; the Street, Drainage and Building Act 1974 and the Local Government Act 1976.
“Gated communities” means the particular development, its facilities and services including infrastructure (roads, drains, etc) within the development are privately managed and owned.
Usually some form of physical barrier surrounds the boundaries to the development. By contrast, guarded communities refer to communities where residents employ private security to provide security services to an area which includes public spaces.
Advocates of this security barrier have used the verdict to validate their reasons to put up security barriers, even at areas that were not certified as gated communities.
It certainly made things worse for DBKL as there was a rush by RAs to establish their own security scheme with boom gates, security fences, perimeter fencing and guard houses.
Residents even registered their associations with the Registrar of Societies (ROS) and put up barriers almost immediately without fulfilling DBKL guidelines.
According to DBKL, from 2011 to July 2017, 158 residents associations in Kuala Lumpur implemented the guarded security scheme, but only approved 65.
This means 58.8% of the RAs are operating their security scheme illegally.
While DBKL was willing to accommodate the requests as permitted by law, clearly the situation got out of hand at some neighbourhoods today.
Bukit Bandaraya resident Mitra Logan said some of the barricades were questionable. “Steel fencing permanently block public roads, including roads that lead to public parks, sports facilities and schools,’’ she said.
This proliferation of “walled” communities, Mitra said, was having far-reaching consequences on a community and, in some cases, divided residents.
“I live in Bangsar and sometimes I am treated like an outsider in my own neighbourhood. “It’s even worse when family and friends visit. They are made to feel like criminals,’’ she said, adding that her sister was asked to produce her ID by the guard.
“What happens if there is a medical emergency or fire, the ambulance and fire engines cannot access the area because someone decided to permanently close up a public road?
Senior citizens Peter Yap, 67, and Ronnie Loh, 59, from Taman Desa complained that the nearest route to their neighbourhood playground was permanently blocked by a steel gate.
“So now, instead of walking to my park, I have to drive there,’’ Yap lamented. “It never used to be this way,’’ Loh said, adding that it was inconvenient and illegal.
Residents of Desa Aman Cheras who do not pay for the neighbourhood security scheme claim that they are forced to use a different road when entering and exiting their homes, which violates their rights as residents.
Following a barrage of complaints from unhappy residents, StarMetro went to the ground to check out the problem.
Re-auditing security schemes
Kuala Lumpur mayor Tan Sri Mohd Amin Nordin Abdul Aziz said neighbourhoods with guarded schemes approved by DBKL would be checked again and re-audited.
He said the scheme was implemented to improve public safety and security, and never should it be an excuse to break the law.
“We need to relook at some of the guarded schemes as there is certainly room for improvement, particularly in cases where public roads are blocked,” he said.
“The problem starts when there is a payment issue and the RAs use the system to punish non-payers,’’ he said, adding that dividing communities was not DBKL’s intention.
He added that it was important to ensure that non-paying residents were not penalised in any way or even made to feel like outsiders in their own area.
“You cannot stop a person from entering a public road and there should never be segregation in any way that could lead to animosity among the residents,” he stressed. Abd Hamid said roads leading to public facilities such as schools, religious institutions, public parks, sports facilities and community halls cannot be cordoned off.
“You cannot prevent anyone from getting to this places and you cannot permanently seal off any public road,’’ he said.
He added that if there was a strong request from residents to close a road, only a local road would be considered and the RA must offer an alternative route for residents and the public which must be a reasonable distance not exceeding 150m. That is also subject to the RA securing 100% consent from residents.
“You see it is not easy to simply close roads in the city, we make it very hard to do so,’’ he said. Abd Hamid said DBKL had demolished illegal barriers in Taman Desa twice in a row, but the persons involved put them (gates) up yet again.
He added that some RAs would bring in their lawyers to argue their point during meetings to justify their reasons (for blocking roads). “Even I was asked to provide ID when carrying out a site visit in a guarded community in Jalan Kemaris Bangsar recently. “I was travelling in a DBKL car,’’ Abd Hamid said, adding that it was illegal to ask a person to hand over their MyKad.
“While we realise the need for people to feel secure in their own homes, there is no doubt that RAs are struggling to manage the scheme properly and this has resulted in conflict and disagreements, which is not what we anticipated’’ he said.
METRO NEWS
By Bavani M
Thursday, 15 Mar 2018
https://www.thestar.com.my/
TAGS / KEYWORDS:
Central Region , Guarded Security Scheme
Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/metro-news/2018/03/15/dbkl-no-intention-to-divide-communities-local-authority-to-review-security-schemes-in-residential-ar/#aKHAOFRSLdYBsMaQ.99
*****************
Gated And Guarded Community In Klang
If you have heard about it, The MPK has just recently torn down the barriers and removed the temporary guardhouse of one of the gated and guarded area in Bukit Tinggi, after complaint received among the residents in that particular Taman.
Yup~ Selangor State Government has announced earlier, in order to be gated and guarded(G&G) residential area, one area has to get 100% consent from the residents. Which meant that even if there is one objection from among residents, the G&G application won’t get approval from local authority!!This definitely has created disappointment among residents, especially when the rising of the crime rate, G&G is a MUST for everyone to stay peacefully.
There are 2 different types of G&G community in Klang. First is the one that originally G&G by Developer, like Ambang Botanic 1 and Ambang Botanic 2, and also Bandar Parkland Precinct 1~3A. which when developer started to built, they planned it as a whole compound, to include the landscaping and garden altogether, to ensure the residents enjoy the exclusiveness of the environment. Definitely, by promoting the uniqueness and exclusiveness of the living environment, developer get higher margin!
Second type of G&G is the G&G community initiated by Residents Association(RAs) of particular area, we called it as G&G Afterwards. These become popular for the past decade, when higher crime rate become threats to most of the people. RAs normally have a lot of convincing and canvassing work to do, they need to walk through every houses, try to persuade every residents to join the G&G scheme.
Few years back, for RAs to get their G&G approval from local authority, they only need 85% of consent from residents. Only last year, State Government has came out with new guidelines, to get approval for G&G, RAs have to get 100% consent from residents, which most of RAs think is mission impossible !! Bandar Bukit Tinggi, Butterfly Park, Bandar botanic, Precinct Bidara, Angsana, Cassia are all considered as G&G Afterwards. Local Authority normally allowed them to fence up only residential area, but not the public area, lake, park etc.
In fact, G&G original from Developer, they collected higher maintenance fees compare to those G&G afterwards. For example, Ambang Botanic 1 monthly maintenance fees for superlink will be RM250 monthly, while for link house in Bandar Botanic, the maintenance fees only RM50~60 monthly.
But the G&G afterwards community they normally face difficulties when getting everyone to pay, as they don’t have rights to ban those unpaid residents to go into their own property. Whereby G&G originally from Developer, they already had the Agreement signed beforehand, if the residents not paying maintenance, management has the right to inactivate their access card, and stop them from enter the residential area.
References:
https://klangproperties.com/
https://www.thestar.com.my/metro
April 23, 2018 by emily
*****************
Datuk Awarded RM487000 Over Break-In At Gated Community
KUALA LUMPUR: A businessman whose bungalow in a gated community here was broken into has been awarded RM486,988 after the High Court held that the terms laid down in its brochures and sale-and-purchase (S&P) agreement had been breached.
Justice Azmel Ma’amor ruled that the developer, Kumpulan Sierramas (M) Sdn Bhd, and its management corporation were liable for the special damages suffered by Datuk Soo Lai Sing due to the lack of security at the Sierramas Resort Homes in Sungai Buloh, contrary to the promises made in the brochure and the S&P agreement.
The judge handed down the ruling on Thursday after deliberating on submissions by counsel for the parties. Soo’s counsel, Olivia Ho, had argued that representations made in brochures and newsletters which materialised into agreed contractual terms in the S&P agreement and Deed of Mutual Covenants dated March 17, 1995, were of probative value and should be considered by the court.
Soo, 53, who was also awarded interest on the damages sum, filed his suit in July 2000.
In the suit, he said he bought the bungalow unit in 1995 as he was attracted to the unique concept which promised excellent security facilities for its residents.
He said he even agreed to pay, upon delivery of vacant possession, a service charge stated in the S&P agreement in return of facilities, which included maintenance of security.
Soo, 53, moved into his home in October 1999 and at 8am on March 10, 2000, his house was burgled.
He lost close to half a million ringgit after knife-wielding robbers escaped with cash S$100,000 (RM250,000) and RM5,000, a shotgun, four Rolex watches, jewellery and other items.
There was undisputed evidence that the robbers had gained access into the housing estate by cutting through the electronic perimeter fencing, which was supposedly armed with an alarm system and CCTV cameras, he said.
Soo added that he had attempted to fix some fences as additional security to secure the premises, but this was objected to by the defendants on the grounds that the additional height contravened the terms of the Deed.
He said that after the robbery, the robbers managed to escape detection by the defendants’ security control.
He claimed that the misstatement and negligence by the defendants had caused him to incur losses and damages.
In their defence, the developer and the management company, represented by Maidzuara Mohammed, said they had informed the residents via their in-house newsletter, Berita Sierramas, about the malfunctions in the security system.
They said that residents had been reminded, through a circular, to take precautions to safeguard their valuables.
They denied any contribution to the losses or damages suffered by Soo.
The Star Online
Nation
Saturday, 08 May 2004
12:00 AM MYT
By CHELSEA L.Y. NG
Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2004/05/08/datuk-awarded-rm487000-over-breakin-at-gated-community#3OlTgBdbezzOt73Z.99
****************
Living In Gated Areas While Crooks Go Free
I REFER to The Star report on the new rules for gated and guarded housing areas as I am very concerned about the level of crime in Malaysia.
Only the security companies profit, while the criminals will eventually find ways to defeat the security.
I am a post-graduate student currently studying in New Zealand. While it is not true to say that there is no crime there, the houses are not as heavily barricaded as they are in Malaysia, and people can walk freely without fear of motorcycle-riding purse snatchers.
Malaysians should not look at the increasing number of gated communities as a sign of “progress”. Rather, it is a symptom of our communities reacting to the disease of crime.
Clearly, the solution to this problem is not merely to build higher walls, but to remove the criminals from our streets.
Source:
https://www.hba.org.my/main.htm
22/03/2007
The Star
By Ariff Khalid, Hamilton, New Zealand
******************
Guarded & Gated Community Makes It Difficult For Local Authorities To Render Services.
Living in a gated community is not entirely trouble-free as residents in such places have to bear with a major problem such as getting the local authorities to provide services such as garbage collection, clearing drains and covering potholes.
As ratepayers, the residents are entitled to such services. However, the physical barrier put up at the guarded and gated community makes it difficult for the local authorities to render such services.
Alinah: ‘Access roads that are blocked do not belong to the residents’. “We know the local authority is supposed to provide us with the services but then when we contacted them, they say they could not come in.
They said we should do away with the security guard and barrier at our main entrance. But then again, if we remove the guards and the gates what is the point of calling it a gated community,” said Janet Leong who has been residing in one of the oldest gated community in Shah Alam.
Leong, who wished not to reveal the location of her house, claimed that they have been facing the problem for several years. She said her residents association had been arguing with the local authority and their management company for quite sometime on the issue.
Such problems are quite common, said Selangor Housing and Real Property Board executive director Datin Paduka Alinah Ahmad. She said usually residents or housebuyers were the ones at the losing end.
“Previously there were no clear guidelines for the developers to follow, leaving many grey areas which at the end leads to problems,” she said during a talk on the Implementation of Gated Community Development in Selangor held at Carlton Holiday Hotel and Suites, Shah Alam recently.
The problems include the public’s right to access a gated area without screening, legal rights of management corporations to the common areas and service charge collection.
Alinah said the access roads to the residential development were usually blocked to allow access to residents only.
“However, these blocked access roads do not belong to the residents living in such housing schemes,” she said, adding that once the developer applied for the titles for the individual homes in the area, the access roads had to be handed over to the local authority.
“The problem will arise when the application is made for individual titles for the houses in the area as the title was released without the access roads and other common areas being handed over to the local council. That means the local authority cannot go in and maintain the road and provide service to the residents,” she said.
Selangor state housing committee chairman Datuk Mokhtar Dahlan said the implementation of the new guidelines on gated communities would ensure that residents get their services from the local authority without sacrificing the security and safety they wanted.
“The state government hopes the guidelines will cover the grey areas and provide common solutions to problems faced by local authorites, developers and residents or housebuyers,” he added.
Source:
https://www.hba.org.my/main.htm
10/05/2007
The Star
****************
T - Guarded and Gated Communities and Townships
The Sun Daily
24 APR 2015 / 16:45 H
HAVING gone through the GP022 document drawn up by the Federal Town and Country Planning Department under the Housing and Local Government Ministry and run through its guidelines, and taken a legislative look at what the local law and its Acts state, we now look at the social and emotional implications of guarded communities, which are fast developing in Malaysia, as they have been all around the globe.
In fact, over the last few years, many newly launched local property developments came with gated and guarded features. It's almost as if it had become a norm to reside in areas like these. One asks then, if this is a privilege or a necessity?
Are we buying safety or exclusivity? And how will this impact society down the road?
Western view
A dissertation was written by Keith Veal, a political science student at the University of Michigan, for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. In it, he cited his experience, having walked into a G&G residential area where the guard was no where to be found, and how he was rudely questioned and shown the way out, when his entry was discovered.
Hostile, sharp, accusatory and unpleasant words were uttered by the "security" personnel, almost instantly putting Veal in defence mode. Haven't many of us encountered similar experiences?
This sparked many questions, of which Veal decided to ask those living outside the boundaries of the G&G area, their views on gated communities.
On social and emotional implications, it really boils down to which side of the "gate" you're on inside or out.
Here are some facts Veal learnt:
» Gated communities are quickly becoming the
fastest growing housing development in the
United States (Blakely
and Snyder, 1997).
» Currently over 7 million people live behind a mechanical gate or private security guard (American Housing Survey, 2001).
» From the early 1980s to the present, the number of gated communities has grown from five thousand to over twenty thousand (Blakely and Snyder, 1997).
» According to the latest survey data, 5.9% of all housing units report living in a community that is surrounded by a wall or a fence (American Housing Survey, 2001).
» The number of gated communities varies by region. On the West coast, 11% of all housing units are walled compared to 6.8% in the South, 3.1% in the Northeast and 2.1% in the Midwest (Ibid). These developments are more prevalent in new construction and therefore are more concentrated in regions experiencing new growth (US Census, Metropolitan Housing Survey, 2004).
» The Dallas Metropolitan area has the third largest (after Houston and Los Angeles) number of gated communities in the country with 13% of all housing units walled AND gated (US Census, Metropolitan Housing Survey, 2004).
» Owners who live in gated communities are more likely to be White, have higher incomes and are older. Renters who live in gated communities are three times more likely to be Latino or African American, have moderate to lower income and are younger. In fact, there are more Latino renters in gated developments than any other group (Sanchez, Lang and Dhavale, 2005).
» Renters are two-and-a-half times more likely to live in walled or fenced communities and are three times more likely to have controlled access than homeowners (Ibid).
» Gated communities – overall – do not have lower crime rates compared to similar communities without gates (Blakely and Snyder, 1997). Gated communities do not tend to have higher resale values in the market when compared to similar housing. In some cases they even had a slight price disadvantage (Ibid). Gated communities do not have higher levels of community or being "close-knit" (Low, 2001).
No doubt, G&G areas restrict access, limit interactions and divide communities. Veal also mentioned that if G&G areas focus on safety, then those on the outside become the "amorphous other … not limited to solely criminals and potential law-breakers …"
And when G&G areas are occupied by the "upper class," Veal considers those "gated-out" as "different from the upper class – socially, economically and politically."
Beginning of G&G
Preferring to remain anonymous, a reader (and "provider of security for 10s of housing estate committees in Klang Valley") emailed his views on how G&G first started.
He says: "Some 15 years ago, there was a need to form some sort of security scheme as crime, house break-ins and snatch theft was on the rise.
We called this scheme 'homeguards' which was basically patrolling without requiring any fencing or boom-gates.
The monthly fee was cheap. However, this did not deter the ruthless and crafty criminals … and the police could not do anything but say to the public: 'Itu biasa dah'."
He adds that this led to complaints that reached the ears of the many politicians who were further enraged when "bad reports" from the media put them in tight spots and the government was not much help.
"It was the local councillors and politicians that came up with the many suggestions and ideas to close up roads and place guards from private security companies in hotspot crime areas.
It all worked well until law suits followed (referring to the case where the fire engine could not get to a location in time, blaming the key to the locked boom gate was not accessible, and a person's life was lost)."
He also names a couple of housing areas where the developer's or property management company has put up notices claiming no liability if motorists get their vehicles damaged by the boom gates.
"Crime rates still rose in the subsequent years which led to the residents associations deciding to take matters into their own hands – hence (to keep costs low/affordable), foreign 'guards' were employed."
Citing many reports including the Berkeley Gardens case in Klang, go-downs in Banting and Sungai Buloh area and such, which led to the rakyat losing trust in our police force and the authorities, he states, "All this mooted the idea of proper security-guarded enclaves."
The reader also says that there are laws governing G&G housing estates where the developers have applied for this status (with one main entrance and exit, with a proper guardhouse and boom gates) which has been approved by the authorities.
"Maintenance fees are high and a joint management board is engaged to run the day-to-day activities. It is similar to an up-market condo, with all the rules and extras where one has to pay to keep the premises clean and orderly."
His point: "The government needs to step in to make every district safe via the police force or some security arrangement. Citizens should not need to pay additional amounts for the security of their homes and families.
The people also should not have to worry and leave their homes and families to 'work out' the security and safety issues of their neighbourhood. The law must be followed through – police must carry out their responsibilities accordingly and law breakers must be punished."
He also condones whipping in public as punishment and asks for more CCTVs. "And G&G must be government-controlled."
Others' perspective
theSun considered the views of the rakyat where gated communities and social segregation is concerned. Says Y S Ying, a retiree who lives in a condominium: "I don't believe in gated communities.
Why does the work of the police, who are entrusted to restore peace and safety, need to be done by others, and the people have to pay for safety? Besides, even with G&G areas, there still are thefts, break-ins and such.
In addition, I know many residents who do not like to be asked so many personal questions and have to leave their personal details with guards, especially when at times they are in a hurry.
Friends also prefer not to visit due to this inconvenience." On it spurring social segregation, Sandra doesn't think it does. "Generally, there is a perceived notion that gated communities are better neighbourhoods with real estate that fetches better resale value."
Sharon Saw comments: "It is a sad reflection of society that we need gated communities to improve security. Personally, I do not like gated residential areas as it causes a lot of inconvenience when visiting people living in that area – you need to present your IC and wait for the registration process, etc.
However, I don't feel that it segregates society because we are already segregated. Many of us don't even know our neighbours, so what is the big deal about being segregated from a particular community with barriers?"
Saw does state that she likes a particular gated housing area in the Klang Valley which "once you are within the residential area, the houses all have no fences or gates it has an open feel where you can just walk up to one's front door. I wish we did not have to live behind fences and grills like we are in prison. But if that's the price of security in this increasingly unsafe world, what can I say?"
Says Jenn Salim: "Gated communities serve no purpose unless the full and complete process of identification/registration is adhered to and monitored properly. On the residents, whether gated or not, it is one's attitude that causes segregation in the community."
One who wishes to be known as Anak Malaysia states: "It will surely lead to some social impact and create a more prominent gap between the communities on both sides of the boom gate who will look at each other differently."
Anak Malaysia reminisces the days of Rukun Tetangga where the rakyat were seen "bergotong-royong, tolong menolong satu sama lain", in unity.
"Society has changed today … and if the government does not do what it is supposed to do, the rakyat will need to be self reliant and take things into their own hands. We can forget about 1Malaysia then."
*************
Luggage Murders: Two Suspects Are Security Guard Brothers From Punjab
The Star Online
Friday, 30 Aug 2019
7:00 PM MYT
By M. KUMAR
SHAH ALAM: The husband was the first to be killed and dumped in the double murder of a couple who were found stuffed in bags in separate locations here, say the police.
Shah Alam OCPD Asst Comm Baharudin Mat Taib said police had roughly pieced together the timeline of the gruesome double murder by two brothers from the state of Punjab in India.
“We believe they killed the husband, Lim Ah Kee @ Lim Kok Hoe, 79, in the living room of the couples’ apartment first, sometime between 10pm and 12am on August 23.
“They then stuffed the body into a bag, transported it on a motorcycle and dumped it into a drain near the Alam Megah LRT station, ” he said at a press conference held at the Shah Alam police headquarters on Friday (Aug 30).
The two brothers, age 19 and 24, who were staying in the same condominium with the couple, then killed the wife, Tan Siew Mee, 52, when she returned home from her job as a restaurant manager a few hours later at 2am.
“They then stuffed her body in a similar bag and dumped it the same way in a drain at Persiaran Kuala Selangor, Section 27.
“The husband was stabbed seven times and the wife, 13 times.
"Both also had their throats slit, ” he said.
ACP Baharudin declined to comment on whether the murders were due to a disagreement between the couple, who were subletting a room to the two brothers for RM900, and their killers.
“The motive is still under investigation.
"The two suspects had been staying there for over six months, ” he said.
Tan’s body was discovered on August 26 by a member of the public.
The two brothers, who worked as security guards, were picked up by the police separately just an hour apart on Thursday around 2pm in Subang Jaya and Kota Kemuning.
They led police to Lim’s body a couple of hours later.
Police have recovered the murder weapon, a folding knife, Lim’s mobile phone and a backpack belonging to the younger brother following the arrests.
“We consider this case as solved following these arrests, ” he said.
The brothers have been remanded until Sept 5 to facilitate investigations.
Related stories:
Hubby, wife found dead in luggage bag
Police identify dead woman found stuffed in suitcase in Shah Alam
Body of woman found stuffed in suitcase in Shah Alam
*******************
Security Guard, Storekeeper Charged With Possession Of LTTE Items
BUTTERWORTH (Bernama): Two men were charged in a separate Sessions Court here on two counts each of possessing items linked to the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) terrorist group on Tuesday (Oct 29).
In the court before judge Norhayati Mohamad Yunus, security guard, M. Pumugan, 29, was charged with possessing items linked to LTTE in a handphone at a parking area in front of N.S.E Lorry Transport Sdn Bhd office, Lorong Industri Ringan, Permatang Tinggi, in Seberang Prai Tengah here at 3.16pm on Oct 12.
On the second count, he was charged with the same offence, allegedly committed at a house in Juru, Bukit Mertajam here at 4.15pm on the same day.
In the court before judge Noor Aini Yusof, storekeeper, S. Thanagaraj, 26, was charged with two counts of committing a similar offence.
The offences were allegedly committed at Sky Thommas Food Industries Sdn Bhd, Jalan Perindustrian Bukit Minyak 2, Kawasan Perindustrian Bukit Minyak, and at No 7, Lorong Sejahtera 3, Taman Sejahtera, Seberang Prai Tengah at 10am and 11am, respectively, also on Oct 12.
All the charges against the two men were framed under Section 130JB (1)(a) of the Penal Code which provides imprisonment for up to seven years, or with fine, and shall also be liable to forfeiture of the items concerned, if found guilty.
Penang prosecution director Yusaini Amer Abdul Karem, who prosecuted, did not offer bail as Pumugan and Thanagaraj, both represented by lawyer Dr N. Ahilan, are detained under the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act, which does not allow bail.
Both the courts set Dec 16 for mention. - Bernama
The Star Online
Tuesday, 29 Oct 2019
7:58 PM MYT
Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2019/10/29/security-guard-storekeeper-charged-with-possession-of-ltte-items#4UDGe9FqOrSrrshg.99
****************
Subang Man’s Myvi Hijacked in Apartment Parking Lot, Security Guards Laugh at Him For Chasing After It
World of Buzz
Published on October 22, 2019
By Renushara
Can you imagine having to fear for your life even within your condominium’s parking lot with security guards?
A 30-year-old man in Bandar Sunway actually had his car stolen from his own apartment’s parking lot, after he had gotten home from a long night. Mr O.K. spoke to WORLD OF BUZZ regarding the incident which shook him to his core.
“I had reached home at about 3:20am after a night out with some friends. I just reversed into my parking spot in the apartment’s guarded resident carpark when a Malay man approached my driver’s door and started talking to me. I couldn’t hear anything and considering I was already within the building, I assumed he was just another resident who was asking for some sort of help,” Mr O.K. told us.
When he opened his car door, things immediately went wrong. The man pulled Mr O.K. out of his Myvi and immediately drove out of the car park, even stopping to use his parking card to tap out without hesitation, while a security guard sat at the exit.
“I was stunned for a moment and without thinking, I chased after my car as far as I could, but he had sped off,”
After the necessary reports were made, it was time to pull out the security tapes to assist with the police’s investigation but the most important footage, a clear shot of the thief’s face from the parking lot’s tap out camera was unattainable as according to the guards, that particular CCTV was not working that night.
“How did he manage to enter the premises in the first place? Non-residents would have to register themselves at the apartment’s main entrance, and there is even footage of him waiting outside for someone to exit the elevator lobby and slipping in before the door closed,”
The apartment’s elevator lobby is only accessible to the building’s management and staff as well as the residents via a chip, hence visitors would have to be escorted in by a guard.
What’s more disturbing is the fact that the apartment’s security team can be heard laughing at Mr O.K. in a recording of the CCTV of him chasing after his car.
Mr O.K.’s Myvi can be seen speeding off. After it did, the security guards are heard saying, “Hold it, hold it, here’s he comes,” before bursting into laughter upon sight of Mr O.K. running after his car.
“As security guards, you are supposed to make us feel safe, yet when you failed at making sure our resident car park is a safe place for us to park, you laugh when something bad happened,” Mr O.K. told WORLD OF BUZZ.
The incident is still currently under police investigation.
The whole purpose of having a security team is to ensure that the residents of the apartment feel safe and secure about not only living but also parking their vehicles there, which is why residents have to pay for maintenance and parking fees.
*****************
2 Thugs Rob A Helpless Old Auntie In Her Klang Home Right In Front of Guard House
Published on November 1, 2019
By Chee Kin
Home is where the heart is. Which is why for most of us, home is where we feel the safest. It’s where we leave our worries at the door and are able to unwind. It’s not surprising in that case, how most people tend to make an effort to look for safe neighbourhoods to live in, especially ones that are gated and guarded. Got guard, must be safe lah.
But don’t be so sure of that, because this Facebook post might just change your whole perception on having guard houses.
In security camera footage obtained from what is allegedly a house located in Taman Klang Jaya, we see an elderly lady driving up her car to park inside the porch of her home. Her automatic gate opens to give way for her, and she brings her car to a stop in the shade of her home.
Before the automatic gates could properly close shut behind her, however, a car that had driven past her house suddenly gostan back and parks right in front of the gate. In a blink of an eye, a man steps out of the car and manages to dart into the porch.
Yanking the old woman’s car door open, he then holds her against her will and gets her to open her automatic gate to allow his accomplice to enter the home and open the door leading into her home.
Once the door is open, the man then appears to hold something against the old woman’s back and pushes her towards her home. From what we can see in the CCTV footage, the poor old woman looks completely terrified and is helpless to fight back!
She even needs to use a tongkak to walk! How to run away?
What happened to the old lady remains unknown at this point, as the video doesn’t show much after the gates of her house are closed. The big question is, what were the guards doing the whole time when they were within visible distance?!
We sincerely hope and pray that nothing happened to the poor old woman, and also hope that the authorities will be able to find the men who did this to her and bring them to justice.
**************
Guard Laughs As Court Passes Death Sentence
Thursday, 14 Nov 2019
Compiled by C. ARUNO, FATIMAH ZAINAL and R. ARAVINTHAN
Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2019/11/14/guard-laughs-as-court-passes-death-sentence#YySLOirH8qrZ5iaR.99
A SECURITY guard charged with murdering two colleagues in 2017 laughed when the Shah Alam High Court sentenced him to death, Sinar Harian reported.
Mohd Ferdaus Suwardi, 32, was also talking to himself when Justice Datuk Ab Karim Ab Rahman read out the judgment.
Justice Ab Karim said the accused had anti-social personality disorder and drug abuse issues but was still of sound mind and realised that his actions were wrong.
“When he was committing the crime, the accused knew that there was no one at the scene and he locked the door, knowing that the two victims were asleep, ” he said.
“The accused then left the scene and returned to his village to admit to his mother what he had done.”
On Aug 4, two guards at a chicken processing factory, Wan Amir Hamzah Abu Hassan, 48, and Syed Mohd Fazrul Syed Mohd Ridhwan, 23, were found dead with slash marks on their body.
The factory owner’s son found their remains in a room when they failed to be contacted for three days.
Although suffering from rare mucopolysaccharidosis type four disease since birth, artist Nur Fariza Abu Hassan has a rare talent, Harian Metro reported.
The 34-year-old can make beautiful paintings and drawings that even her favourite actor, Ben Amir, was impressed.
Nur Fariza, who became a full-time artist three years ago, recently drew a portrait of Ben, and her brother shared the drawing on his Twitter.
Impressed by the portrait, Ben offered to buy the artwork from Nur Fariza, who never thought that he would ever notice her portrait of him.
She mainly shares her artwork on Instagram and after receiving many commissions from her followers, she was encouraged to produce more paintings.
The Star
https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/
Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2019/11/14/guard-laughs-as-court-passes-death-sentence#YySLOirH8qrZ5iaR.99
